I admire the sentiment, but I can't admit to such profound detachment that I don't actually desire to be published sometime. (And Hemingway couldn't either, as you might notice!) I still think, though, that it's important to remember that we don't (or shouldn't) write for the sole purpose of becoming known. Writing for me is a contemplative act, and one that grows in privacy. Ideally I should have the attitude of medieval craftsmen, putting elaborate carvings high up on the cornices and ceilings where no one but God could see them. I say ideally, because I am nowhere near such heights of serenity at the moment.
My sister and I have been discussing anonymity, having spent a rough 24 hours dealing with some opinionated folk who very stridently make their views heard. (I'm not opinionated, of course. If I were opinionated, I'd do something like start a blog where I could air my opinions...oh wait...) Anyway, it makes us want to curl up inside a shell a bit, and do things just for the sake of doing them. Emily Dickinson puts it so alluringly:
I'm nobody! Who are you?
Are you nobody, too?
Then there 's a pair of us -- don't tell!
They 'd banish us, you know.
How dreary to be somebody!
How public, like a frog
To tell your name the livelong day
To an admiring bog!
She does make the rat race seem very small and petty, doesn't she? Perhaps it is far better and more fruitful to have your art be a wonderful secret that you share with the other nobodies. And its true, I think, that fame would be a very tedious experience. It's odd, because while I don't have any desire for fame, I do wish sometimes to be part of the communities of the respected - you know, to be in a position to chat with Russell T Davies about his creative choices and whatnot.
But is the price of that to become a "public frog?" I suppose it's mostly a matter of luck, whether to find (conventionally defined) success you have to croak your own name so loud that your throat gets raspy and you forget what it was all for to begin with. I want to croak other people's names: my characters', my artistic heroes', my friends' and my enemies' and God's.
I have a feeling that Emily Dickinson is going to become much more important to me in the coming months. And she was the truly, enthusiastically anonymous poet --- and look at how she's still touching hearts.
Ah! I loved this post, Michelle! I noticed it last night and had something to look forward to when I woke up this morning.
ReplyDeleteI've pondered a little bit on this wonderful anonymity of ours... I think good things must start in small places... and I am glad to be able to have that. However, when i think of possibilities of getting published, I have to be careful or it goes to my head. I think there is a certain fruitful humility that comes from our "frogness"... keeps us creating geniunely from our hearts and looks us forward to the day when we might spill an honest and beautiful message to the rest of the world!
I wonder when that day will come...
I think there's something to be said for fame. If you're famous, you can shout the names of your friends, enemies, etc. from much higher ground, to be heard by many more people. Writing may come from a contemplative state of mind but it is communication and someone out there should be receiving the message. I guess I'm saying I don't think there's anything wrong with ambition or the desire to be famous, as long as you're famous for being yourself and your work isn't pandering. (I was tempted to leave this comment as "Anonymous" . . .)
ReplyDeleteI know, I am so aware of the irony of writing about this on my blog...
ReplyDelete